Startup M&A

  • Few contrarian buyers out there, and for many startups there is plenty of cash in the bank.
  • In 2021, there were more than 3,000 M&A deals globally involving a VC-backed company getting bought, according to Crunchbase. Halfway through the third quarter of this year, just under 1,600 startups have found a mate in the market.
  • The picture is worse in the US.
  • Source: Crunchbase.

ETF Innovation

  • Some interesting things are going on in ETF land.
  • First the rise of single stock ETFs – offering anything from -1x to +1.5x.
  • NB these aren’t new in the UK but only recently launched in the US.
  • This idea is also spreading to bonds – with single bond ETFs becoming popular including single-year, bullet bond ETF trackers.

Venture Technology Clusters Over Time

  • Using a machine learning model Sparkline Capital were able to cluster firms in similar technologies and then look at how venture investment in these tech clusters evolved over time.
  • This leads to the following chart of cycles.
  • In the dot-com bubble, venture capital firms threw money at internet companies. Next, Blackberry and iPhone ushered in the mobile age. Then, Facebook’s success sparked a wave of investment into social networks. Artificial intelligence grew steadily over the past decade, while blockchain burst on the scene a few years ago. Climate tech investment faded after an initial burst but is now seeing a resurgence.

Communication Cost History

  • Meet one of the most dramatic changes in communication costs in history.
  • The introduction of the first modern postal system in Britain in 1840.
  • A 1839 Act of Parliament created the Uniform Penny Post – a single low postage rate and the first adhesive postage stamp, replacing a complex distance based system.
  • The results were monumental and, as this paper finds, also improved innovation.
  • Today, 73% of people in the UK consider post as essential or fairly important.

Or are things going to get a lot worse?

  • Here is a counter to a collection of positive charts posted a few weeks back.
  • The article takes a pessimistic position that, if nothing changes, we have already crossed the point where it is certain things will get worse.
  • Megafires, inflation, pandemic, heat – all could be signs of extinction.
  • Alarmist but nonetheless sober reading.

What if reading is bad?

  • You are reading text right now. It engulfs our lives.
  • Between 1900 and 1990, the amount of time the average American spent reading and writing remained broadly consistent: somewhere between one and two hours a day.” 
  • With the advent of the internet and text messaging – this more than doubled to four to five hours.
  • It is estimated the average internet user sees 490,000 words per day (more than War and Peace!).
  • As this wonderful contrarian article argues – this might not, as many argue, be all good.
  • Every time we read, we inevitably conceptualize the world, in perhaps an ever-increasingly abstract way. And it’s conceivable that we may reach a point where those abstracting effects go too far.
  • Article sourced from The Browser – a brilliant resource.

Are things getting better?

  • This collection of charts tries to present some cheerful evidence that things in the US have gotten better.
  • For example, this chart shows that “people in every age group are less likely to die of heart disease, in any given year, than they were in 1990.
  • Interestingly, the all-age death rate has improved more slowly. Why? Because we are living longer (pushing the proportion of the 70yrs+ bracket up).
  • The question, on whether humanity’s best days lie ahead, is fascinating.
  • One of the best discussions on this topic was this debate – between Pinker, Gladwell, Ridley, de Botton.

Probabilistic Words

  • People use words to describe probabilities all the time.
  • Yet this leads to a huge amount of confusion, especially in financial press.
  • In this great article, Mauboussin (two of them) lay out learnings from a survey they did on this topic.
  • Take this chart – the term “real possibility” was taken to mean anything from 20%-80% by 1,700 people surveyed – a huge range.
  • Lots of interesting ideas inside on how to “combat” this bias.

Gender and NYRB

  • Interesting chart via The Browser (a must subscribe) plotting each issue of the New York Review of Books (NYRB) by the gender mix of authors.
  • What you are seeing is that there are only twelve issues out of 1228 (1%) to which women have contributed half or more of the articles. Nine of them have appeared within the past three years. Meanwhile there are about 196 issues (16%) to which not a single woman contributed an article.” 
  • Source (more stats inside).

Soros and Reflexivity

  • Many have heard of George Soros’ idea of reflexivity.
  • This idea is important especially as we look at the current market situation.
  • To understand it more deeply it is worth reading Soros’ own writing on the subject – especially this piece from the Journal of Economic Methodology (2014).
  • Here Soros lays out his full framework which is actually based on two propositions – reflexivity but also human fallibility – together the siamese twins that form “the human uncertainty principle”.
  • My conceptual framework deserves attention not because it constitutes a new discovery, but because something as commonsensical as reflexivity has been so studiously ignored by economists.

Ten Commandments by Bertrand Russell

1. Do not feel absolutely certain of anything.

2. Do not think it worthwhile to proceed by concealing evidence, for the evidence is sure to come to light.

3. Never try to discourage thinking for you are sure to succeed.

4. When you meet with opposition, even if it should be from your husband or your children, endeavor to overcome it by argument and not by authority, for a victory dependent upon authority is unreal and illusory.

5. Have no respect for the authority of others, for there are always contrary authorities to be found.

6. Do not use power to suppress opinions you think pernicious, for if you do the opinions will suppress you.

7. Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

8. Find more pleasure in intelligent dissent than in passive agreement, for, if you value intelligence as you should, the former implies a deeper agreement than the latter.

9. Be scrupulously truthful, even if the truth is inconvenient, for it is more inconvenient when you try to conceal it.

10. Do not feel envious of the happiness of those who live in a fool’s paradise, for only a fool will think that it is happiness.

Farnam Street Blog.

Kalshi

  • Nice read from Bloomberg about Kalshi – the CFTC approved prediction market.
  • Especially interesting is the long journey to getting regulators on board in the US (after years or resistance).
  • One day during their time at Y Combinator, Lopes Lara and Mansour say, they cold-called 60 lawyers they’d found on Google. Every one of them said to give up”.

Science is getting harder

  • Fascinating read that collects several pieces of evidence to suggest “that it is increasingly challenging to make discoveries that have comparable impact to the ones in the past“.
  • Consider this chart, for example.
  • It is based on all citations made to academic papers by US patents filed that year (and eventually granted in the next five years).
  • The chart shows the percentage of these citations that were papers published in the preceding five years.
  • The result – “citations to recent work have become increasingly less common“.
  • The rest of the evidence is in this vein, including especially interesting data on how new topics in science are stagnating. This has a nice corollary to this essay here (for progress we need novel things to work on, h/t The Diff).

Substack

  • Interesting argument by an ex FT/FTAV journalist, who has recently started her own newsletter, on why she didn’t chose Substack.
  • One thing that stood out is legal cover. “As it stands, Substack can shift the biggest risk and cost in all journalism — libel risk — onto the shoulders of individual authors.
  • This ties in with news they have dropped their Series C round (at a valuation of $750m – $1bn).
  • The reason is likely down to the fact they made only $9m of revenue last year, suggesting even their previous valuation of $650m is too high.
  • The other thing is moderation – as any platform grows moderation becomes an issue, something other publishers have been quick to point out.

A case for value in technology

  • This was a fascinating read on why some technologies linger and hence have a much longer tail than the market often predicts.
  • The reason – “cultural forces create market demand even if supply is available more efficiently (even infinitely) elsewhere“. In some cases (not obviously just related to age) the perceived value actually increases.
  • Think about movie theaters surviving despite the rise of home cinema. Why? The social value of gathering at the movies.
  • Or enjoying the slow deliberate read of a newspaper.
  • Or the demand, sometimes sinister, for the near 5 million payphone calls made each year in the UK.
  • Decline is inevitable but not in all cases (booming vinyl sales for example).
WordPress Cookie Notice by Real Cookie Banner